Clarkesworld spammed by GPT

Clarkesworld, a science fiction magazine, has recently announced that it will no longer accept pitches from authors using AI-generated stories. This news comes as the magazine continues to receive an unprecedented number of submissions created by computer algorithms instead of human authors.

The decision was met with mixed reactions from the sci-fi writing community, with many writers arguing that AI-generated submissions are taking up resources and opportunities from human writers. Others argue that AI-generated stories can provide unique insights into complex themes and situations not easily articulated by humans.

Though AI-generated stories have been around for some time, recent advances in natural language processing have allowed programs to generate increasingly sophisticated prose. Algorithms are trained to study large amounts of existing literature, analyzing patterns in order to generate their own stories. These artificial intelligence models have even been successful in convincing readers that the stories they generate are written by humans.

Clarkesworld is not the only magazine to take action against AI-generated stories. Other publications, such as Analog Science Fiction & Fact, have implemented new policies to prevent such submissions from being accepted. Publishers like these are concerned that AI-generated stories could ultimately undermine the artistic value of traditional literature, as well as the ability of writers to make a living.

Ultimately, there is no easy answer to this debate between human and AI-generated stories. Some believe that AI-generated stories can be a valuable tool in exploring difficult topics, while others are concerned about the potential impact of AI on the writing industry. For now, Clarkesworld's decision serves as a reminder that the issue of AI-generated stories remains contentious within the sci-fi community.

Read more here: External Link